Just an fyi, I was a meeting in November that included all of the DNR top officials, including the budget people. They are aware of this issue, and admit it was an oversight of the new license package to not include a shorter option. They are working on a revision to the license package to include a shorter, and more cost-effective option.
What's really odd to me is that none of the "watchdog" groups, conservation organizations, or ANYONE recognized this when the license fee package was being developed because the DNR got everyone involved up front (yours truly reviewed it several times...DOH!). So I guess if there's blame to throw, it needs to go across the board because this was not done in a vacuum.