One of the benefits of a forum like this is the ability to compare notes with other hunters around the state. In doing this, it has become apparent to me that a 3.5 year-old buck in Zone 2 will be comparable to a 2.5 year-old buck in Zone 3 in antler and body size. APRs have improved the quality of hunting Up North because there are more older bucks in the woods now, but the studies presented in the video below show it's not just about age. This is from the MSU Deer Lab, and shows nutrition is likely just as important as age and I'm afraid the lighter, sandy soils of Zone 2 will always be a major obstacle for deer to reach their full potential in my neck of the woods.
If there's something for me to take from this, it's to produce more quality deer food, adjust my expectations, and celebrate the 3.5 and 4.5 year old bucks I'm able to outwit, even though they will likely never compare to Zone 3 bucks in size. Perhaps I have been naĂŻve about my area's potential. What's your take?
If there's something for me to take from this, it's to produce more quality deer food, adjust my expectations, and celebrate the 3.5 and 4.5 year old bucks I'm able to outwit, even though they will likely never compare to Zone 3 bucks in size. Perhaps I have been naĂŻve about my area's potential. What's your take?