Considering the purchase of property that would be strictly for hunting and occasional summer camp. I am curious to hear some opinions, should haves, could haves, and any other lessons learned.
Would you rather have state land bordering it or not etc. I have my own, albeit uneducated, opinion but am curious what others think that have been through it and own property
Unattended property tends to be a nonowners playground if accessible.
I'd rather live on it ,than travel to visit.
That said , my hunting property was chosen for it's being part of and it's role of the area it's in.
Specifically , a geographical deer funnel in an area deer gravitate to for security ,and more...
Decent neighbors are a benefit too. They check into any suspicious activity.
Soil matters if you are going to grow anything. And it matters in what browse is available ,and what will be available over time if you don't..
As does sunlight reaching the ground. Turnkey good or better hunting property can get pricey. For good reason.
Up to you if you want a project ,or a poor soil area. Combine them both and you might wish you had looked longer. Unless there are other reasons for wildlife being there. But food and security matter...As can few humans tromping in and around it with killing game in mind.
How far you are comfortable traveling in all weather , and how often you'd be making a run factors. With age , comes a slower packing /unpacking and eventually a shorter cruising range.
State land adjacent has had owners not happy with traffic and trespassing.
A very specific isolated piece might get around most conflicts , but would still not be immune.
IF your activities benefit from land adjacent great. State land near by that you can access seems better than at your border , but that's up to you ,and the state land users attitudes regarding your privacy.
I'd lean toward expecting hunters on the border , at the least.
The wrong neighbors can make a private parcel no fun also.
Who and what is around matters. I'll spare you the stories...
Once read an add for an acre or two in the U.P. adjacent to a trail on public land.
That was attractive at the time for it's location . And for what little existed to worry about.
If someone stole all the timber , so be it. The succession might even draw wildlife.
But , as a "jumping off" site , I would have a place to camp , and access to lots and lots of ground.