The epilogue tells the entire story. Such things as the natives and their ancestors have legal rights. Hunting/fishing subsistence rights allowed for personal and commercial living. ALL lands within the treaty can be used for subsistence living.Did you read the Federal court ruling? This may help clear things up on interpretation. If you don’t feel like reading it all read from the epilogue on.
Interesting reading for those that have followed this issue of Treaty and Consent but have not fully understood the power of the Treaty.
In today's life of political correctness and minority rights, we can only hope, we the angler, don't get hurt too much. In realty, I personally have not been affected with the Consent, I fish wherever I want without violating anything.