Joined
·
38 Posts
Please pardon the rant.
On Saturday I stopped in at the Walmart on Michigan Ave. in Jackson to pick up my deer tags in advance of firearm season. I requested a single buck tag as well as a private land antlerless tag for firearm hunting in Jackson County (DMU 038). She rang me up and I paid and, frankly, I should've known something was amiss when she never asked for the phone number of the private land owner. Oops, my bad. As I walked away from the counter, I looked at my tags and noticed she had sold me a combo tag.
I went back up to her and politely pointed out the error and asked for it to be corrected, at which point she got very huffy, slapped down a copy of this year's hunting digest on the counter and pointed to a chart saying, "Look, this year the combo license covers antlerless deer, too! There are copies of the digest available if you don't know the regs!"
I pointed to the text above the chart which clearly indicated it applied only to the CWD area. Then I flipped a few pages over to show her that you do indeed need an antlerless deer tag to hunt an antlerless deer with a firearm in Jackson County. She snapped back, "Well, you'll have to go do the return at Customer Service, I can't do that here," and stormed off.
So I went to customer service, returned the combo tags, got my refund, and then went back to sporting goods to buy the correct set of licenses. A different employee rang me up that time, but unfortunately Customer Service hadn't voided the combo tags when I returned them, and I had to wait and call the DNR office today and explain the situation. The gentleman at the DNR was very helpful and quickly voided the combo tags.
All that to say, I really hope she didn't sell anyone else combo tags and actually convince them that was all they needed to hunt antlerless deer in Jackson County. Ideally hunters should all know the regs for themselves, but some would likely take her word as gospel and possibly find themselves with a poaching charge as a result.
(Edit) I've been lurking here for a while, but thought I had posted before now. Apparently not. I wouldn't have made my first post a rant if I'd realized it. My apologies. Also, hello! Great forum here.
On Saturday I stopped in at the Walmart on Michigan Ave. in Jackson to pick up my deer tags in advance of firearm season. I requested a single buck tag as well as a private land antlerless tag for firearm hunting in Jackson County (DMU 038). She rang me up and I paid and, frankly, I should've known something was amiss when she never asked for the phone number of the private land owner. Oops, my bad. As I walked away from the counter, I looked at my tags and noticed she had sold me a combo tag.
I went back up to her and politely pointed out the error and asked for it to be corrected, at which point she got very huffy, slapped down a copy of this year's hunting digest on the counter and pointed to a chart saying, "Look, this year the combo license covers antlerless deer, too! There are copies of the digest available if you don't know the regs!"
I pointed to the text above the chart which clearly indicated it applied only to the CWD area. Then I flipped a few pages over to show her that you do indeed need an antlerless deer tag to hunt an antlerless deer with a firearm in Jackson County. She snapped back, "Well, you'll have to go do the return at Customer Service, I can't do that here," and stormed off.
So I went to customer service, returned the combo tags, got my refund, and then went back to sporting goods to buy the correct set of licenses. A different employee rang me up that time, but unfortunately Customer Service hadn't voided the combo tags when I returned them, and I had to wait and call the DNR office today and explain the situation. The gentleman at the DNR was very helpful and quickly voided the combo tags.
All that to say, I really hope she didn't sell anyone else combo tags and actually convince them that was all they needed to hunt antlerless deer in Jackson County. Ideally hunters should all know the regs for themselves, but some would likely take her word as gospel and possibly find themselves with a poaching charge as a result.
(Edit) I've been lurking here for a while, but thought I had posted before now. Apparently not. I wouldn't have made my first post a rant if I'd realized it. My apologies. Also, hello! Great forum here.