Ag Policy Weekly Michigan Farm Bureau

Discussion in 'Deer Hunting Regulations, Proposals, and Law Debat' started by Kosh, Jul 24, 2013.


  1. Kosh

    Kosh Banned

    374
    0
    0
  2. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Antler-less harvest controls the deer population.

    Gotta love the misinformation.
     

    #2 Patman75, Jul 24, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 30, 2015
  3. Not according to the DNR


     
    #3 hartman756, Jul 24, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 30, 2015
  4. bucksnbows

    bucksnbows Banned

    12,721
    4
    0
    Lol. Really.....read your dnr quote.....the end part

    Sent from my LG-P769 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
     
  5. The FB is clearly being fed lies and mis-information by the Concerned SportsmAn. Speaking of the Concerned SportsmAn, why has he stopped posting? Is it a coincidence that Kosh's first post was an article quoting Jim Sweeney, and it was posted a few days after Jim Sweeney stop posting here? :16suspect
     
  6. bucksnbows

    bucksnbows Banned

    12,721
    4
    0
    Why did he quit posting?

    Sent from my LG-P769 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
     
  7. The LPDMI strongly supports the maintenance of deer herds at levels well below both the physical and social carrying capacity of any region in our state. We strongly support a balanced management strategy that is good for both farmers and hunters.

    A big risk to farmers right now is the downturn in the number of hunters across much of our state. Hunters are the main predators of deer. We strongly believe that high hunter satisfaction is a key factor, and that it is enhanced by APRs. High satisfaction keeps hunters in the woods and increases the likelihood that those hunters will participate in antlerless harvest.

    We believe the goals of the LPDMI, and the outcomes from properly managed APR regulations combined with sufficient antlerless harvest, are in the best interest of hunters and that farmers will be better off under APRs than under traditional management, which focuses hunter attention on antlered buck harvest rather than antlerless harvest
     
  8. standsetter

    standsetter Banned

    1,936
    0
    0
    Ask Steve.
     
  9. That dont seem to be working in Leelanau co.
     
  10. standsetter

    standsetter Banned

    1,936
    0
    0
    I hope you don't think you're going to get all that on the survey? Past practices suggest you might need pare that down a bit before it heads to printing. :lol:
     
  11. Swampy,

    You must be just trying to stoke the fire because you know darn well population levels are controlled by the harvest of antler less deer. However you cast a blind eye at the fact antler less permits were significantly reduced in dmu045 shortly after APRs were initiated. For various reasons the Dnr neglected to increase these permits during a time where population levels increased due to higher recruitment levels over a period of three easy winters. You will likely see population levels reduced to a more manageable level this year due to the issuance of some 1400 more permits this season.

    If you want to be taken serious then please portray the issue in a factual nature.
     
  12. standsetter

    standsetter Banned

    1,936
    0
    0
    What are the "various reasons" alluded to?
     
  13. On the contrary. Even thought the DNR reduced the antlerless quota in Leelanau County from 1000-1250 in the two years before APRs down to 2-400 over the last several years, antlerless harvest has remained remarkably stable.

    This is because more hunters have taken up archery hunting, and more hunters have chosen to use their combo tag to harvest an antlerless deer in leelanau County.

    Leelanau County serves as a stunning example of maintenance of antlerless harvest in the face of the decline in antlerless quotas.

    This chart shows the amazing stability of antlerless harvest (blue) even in the face of substantial reduction in quotas (red). During the last 3 years, the harvest has been double the quota. The two highest years since 2001 have occurred in the last 3 years. Why? Antlerless harvest by archery hunters has gone up 45% whereas harvest by firearms hunters has fallen by 55% due to low availability of antlerless tags.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. So getting 25% 50% or whatever the % of hunters all bent out of shape helps how? The MDNR cannot afford any more decrease in hunter #'s This ain't a magic bullet these MAPR's
     
  15. Crossbows!!
     

Share This Page