close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

2 3/4 vs 3 inch slugs????????

Discussion in 'Firearms' started by MuskyDan, Oct 12, 2006.


  1. MuskyDan

    MuskyDan
    Expand Collapse

    4,237
    0
    Trophy Points:
    2,421
    Location:
    Birch Run
    thoughts???
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. jsmith2232

    jsmith2232
    Expand Collapse

    912
    0
    Trophy Points:
    921
    Location:
    Hastings, MI
    I shoot the remington corelokt ultra 385 grainers out of my 1100, I can only shoot 2-3/4" but if i had the option I think i'd stick with it.
     

  3. jmoser

    jmoser
    Expand Collapse

    2,118
    15
    Trophy Points:
    1,423
    Location:
    Oakland Co.
    IMHO:

    Friends and I, all serious shooters, have tried many brands and tend to agree:

    No need for 3" or high velocity 2 3/4" slugs for 'normal' 100 yards shots.
    Heavier/faster slugs not needed and will beat the crap out of you and your scope.

    My accurized 870 cloverleafs at 100 Meters [109 yards] with Remington Copper Solid 2 3/4", these are 1 Oz at 1450 fps. Sight in 2.5" to 3" high at 50 and be close to dead on at 100, still good for center mass shots at 125.

    Unless you REALLY need a 150 yard slug gun then you just do not need 1700 fps or more.

    Having said that try different brands and use what shoots best in your gun.
     
  4. Hunt4Ever

    Hunt4Ever
    Expand Collapse
    Retired

    2,016
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1,671
    Location:
    Ypsilanti, MI USA
    The 2 3/4 kick pretty good. The 3's will bite. I won't shoot them anymore. My standard slug gun shot is 50-60 yards so the 2 3/4 work fine.
     
  5. webfarmer

    webfarmer
    Expand Collapse

    887
    0
    Trophy Points:
    721
    I use Federal 2 3/4" 1 ounce Barnes Expander's. I tried the 3" slugs of various brands and bullet types and the 2 3/4" were always more accurate for some reason out of my Browning A-Bolt shotgun. I wouldn't worry about the recoil - you won't even notice it when you pull the trigger on a nice deer. However, you WILL notice the price of the slug 5 packs. Bought some spares today from Gander Mountain and the Federals mentioned above were $14.99 - equates to $3 a shell!!!!! Matter of fact - everything seemed real expensive today but worth every penney. Good Luck!
     
  6. Ed Michrina

    Ed Michrina
    Expand Collapse

    5,990
    0
    Trophy Points:
    2,421
    Location:
    S/E MI.
    2 3/4 all the way. I tried 3" both did just as well. I did notice after sighting the gun in with 3" I was jerking the trigger/ flinching or just making bad shots.
    Stick with the 2 3/4 they never let me down.
     
  7. Swamp Monster

    Swamp Monster
    Expand Collapse
    Premium Member

    17,583
    4
    Trophy Points:
    2,423
    Only advantage a 3" slug will give you is on paper really. With todays 2 3/4" slugs you can still get sabot loads that are rated at 1900 fps (2000 with the Hornady's and a lighter slug) ((Oh, don't expect to see those rated velocities in every gun though....)) so the 3"ers are really unneccesay. Same goes for the newer 20 gauges as well. The one and only reason I'd ever use 3" slugs was if it were the best shooting slug load in my gun, but that would be a rare case. Course, some people like to brag about the fact they use 3" slugs, why I don't know, the deer sure won't care!
     
  8. bucks-n-trout

    bucks-n-trout
    Expand Collapse

    91
    0
    Trophy Points:
    661
    Location:
    S.W. Michigan
    I have shot many brands of slugs and have yet to find a 3" that shoots better than the 2 3/4". Just extra recoil for no real advantage. I have heard that the new Lightfields ( orange box, 3") shoot very well. Have not tried them as yet.
     
  9. ih772

    ih772
    Expand Collapse

    8,002
    3
    Trophy Points:
    2,423
    Location:
    Lapeer, Mi
    3" slugs just pound the heck out of you and that's about it.
     
  10. Ed Michrina

    Ed Michrina
    Expand Collapse

    5,990
    0
    Trophy Points:
    2,421
    Location:
    S/E MI.
    Man I'm glad to hear all this. I thought I was shotgun sensitive ( a sissy) I hunted for years with my 2 3/4 in my swamp. I love it. one year with 3" and I went back to my 35 cal rifle . All because of kick. I'll stick with my little swamp tack driver but miss my Shotgun.
     
  11. Outdoorsman54

    Outdoorsman54
    Expand Collapse

    36
    0
    Trophy Points:
    661
    Location:
    Taylor, Mi
    I have tried several brands and styles.

    Out of my Remington 11-87 with rifled choke tube, I get very good accuracy with Brenneke Golds for rifled barrels, a 3" load. Consistently putting 5 shots in a 2" circle at 100 yds. I have shot lots of 2 3/4 " loads but none compared out of my gun to the Brenneke golds.

    Just try a bunch of brands and don't let 3" or 2 3/4" be your only factor.
    On the other hand, my shoulder would appreciate the 2 3/4" loads a lot more.:lol: But that is really only true off the bench. In the field I have yet to notice the heavier recoil of the 3" loads.
     
  12. Sargeyork

    Sargeyork
    Expand Collapse

    283
    0
    Trophy Points:
    921
    Location:
    Detroit Metro Area
    These are great slugs but in very short supply, Does anyone know where I can buy any more of these, everyone is out, doesn't carry them, or never heard of them, You can buy online from Lightfield but the shipping charges are going to kill you as they are almost as much as the slugs themselves.

    Sargeyork
     
  13. FREEPOP

    FREEPOP
    Expand Collapse

    17,903
    1,165
    Trophy Points:
    2,753
    I still have a smooth bore slug gun as I get all my deer with a bow :)

    I tried the 3 inch loads and they tumbled out of my gun so I gave them away.
     
  14. mparks

    mparks
    Expand Collapse

    1,594
    11
    Trophy Points:
    1,423
    Location:
    Genesee County
    Am I the only one who ever thought that 3" shells would be more accurate in a 3" chamber? I mean, I don't set my bullets back 1/4" when I reload for rifle shells so why wouldn't the longer shell with the slug closer to the lands be more accurate? Anyway, after several boxes of 3" and 2 3/4" I proved to myself that there was no noticable accuracy gain with the 3" shells I tried in my guns. I'm sure that the trasition over all the plastic in the crimp makes the slightly longer trip to the lands a mute point anyway and makes it an invalid comparision to a conventional rifle scenerio.

    Another thing, a lot of the 3" shells out there just have an extra 1/4" of fiber wad and nothing else is different. Dave Henderson chrono'd several 3" shells from different makers in his book "Shotgunning for Deer" and found that they didn't live up to the velocity claims on the box. There's a whole section about the subject in the book. Looks like Lightfield has this in mind with their marketing of the new 3" shells.
     
  15. Sargeyork

    Sargeyork
    Expand Collapse

    283
    0
    Trophy Points:
    921
    Location:
    Detroit Metro Area
    Marketing has nothing to do with the new Hybred Elite 3". What it has to do with is this load is replacing their older Commander IDS 3" (red box)which has been discontinued due to some lots of these that got out to hunters(like me) last year and had lot to lot consistency problems having to do mostly with the 1 1/16oz slug which has been replaced with a 1 1/4 oz slug in the new Elite.

    Sargeyork