PDA

View Full Version : Ripshad Trolling Chart?




MSUICEMAN
03-17-2004, 02:45 PM
Anyone have a ripshad trolling depth chart??

steve




scottyhoover
03-17-2004, 02:55 PM
It sucks that they removed it from the Xtreme tackle website, no doubt to sell more Precision Trolling 7th ed. (which i'm pretty sure has it)

I had printed one last year just can't seem to find it remember if I still have it somewhere, its wadded up or ripped for sure by now. They used to have it at XtremeTackle.com but as far as i know its gone. Try hitting everyone of there html pages since they number them like page0066.html and maybe we can find it on one of them hehe

Edit: Well they used to keep it at page0048.html but they thoughtfully removed it. Gotta get that 7th Edition now!

More edit: Yeah they will only put lures that aren't in the new book on the web, makes sense from the business perspective! But I want my one free chart back! Heres a Daves Kabooms chart they have http://www.xtremetackle.com/page0052.html

tkpolasek
03-17-2004, 04:45 PM
20' back = 6' deep
45' back = 9' deep
85' back = 12' deep
145' back = 15' deep

scottyhoover
03-17-2004, 04:54 PM
TK has spoken, let it be so. Thanks Tim. Told myself to save that page last year but you know 6th Ed. doesn't allow us to add pages! Need to carry a darn notebook in the boat. Sure hope they get them running somewhat in tune out of box soon.

tkpolasek
03-17-2004, 04:58 PM
I just bought the 7th edition a couple of weeks ago. I am going to go thru my other 2 and see if there is anything in them that I want to transfer to the new one.
I know what you mean about running in tune. The reef runner family of lures are all great baits, but they all need there work to get them to run right. I guess thats why I like the husky jerk and taildancers so much better it seems that 9 out of 10 will run great right out of the box.

Tim

MSUICEMAN
03-17-2004, 07:52 PM
tkpolasek..... whats the line that was used for that? don't they usually say like 10lb mono or something like that? it makes a little difference, but if that wasn't included, thats cool with me anyways.

steve

scottyhoover
03-17-2004, 08:18 PM
thats with 10lb since he pulled it from the book .0134''

MSUICEMAN
03-17-2004, 08:22 PM
yeah, i couldn't remember what the standard used in the book was, thanks.

steve

eyebuster
03-17-2004, 11:40 PM
check you email Steve.......

MSUICEMAN
03-18-2004, 12:41 AM
got it, thanks dave.

steve