View Full Version : Vexilar/Flashers Vs. LCD Fish finders
gamalot
02-20-2004, 12:36 PM
I keep seeing many posts raveing about the superiority of the Vex/Flashers.
It seems to me to be a step back in time when there are so many great LCD fishfinders out there and they are in most cases less expensive.
I use my Garmin 160 both in my boat and on the ice and I find it works just fine in both applications.
The LCDs, in my opinion do everything a flasher does and lots more. Mine has zoom and fish ID and is easily able to tell depths and show fish.
I just don't understand why more hard water fisherman want to go back to flashers when so many advancements have been made in the LCD units and the cost is less.
Can anyone take a moment and explain what I am missing or not seeing by useing my LCD?????????????????
AutoModGod
02-20-2004, 12:47 PM
Instaneous feedback and target separation is the biggest reason for using the VEX for me. Never could mark 1/80th and 1/64th oz jigs in 40 feet of water and be able to tell if they had bait on them with my boat fish finder. With the VEX I can.
Convenience of use is another. The VEX is made for ice fishing; everything is contained in one unit and it is much easier to use than the rig I made to use my boat's fish finder. (Maybe I'm not very good at riggin' things) Bought the VEX 4 or 5 years ago and I don't think I would ever go back.
gamalot
02-20-2004, 12:58 PM
Len, I have no idea if my LCD could seperate a tiny jig with or without bait but I suspect NOT.
Since I fish mainly for deep water fish, Lakers and Trout, what I want the fish finder to tell me is, are there fish down there and what depth are they at.
I guess for those who fish the pearch, Crappie and pan fish lakes that the flasher with such great seperation would be the ticket but I have no need for this intricate detailing.
I did make a portable case for my unit that fits the battery and Xducer and unit and it is a sinch to set up and use and easily as portable as any flasher could possibly be.
I have only ever noticed a problem with the read out on extreamly bitter cold days but otherwise the LCD works fine.
Thanks. Gary
bluedevil
02-20-2004, 02:18 PM
LCD screens can freeze and shorten the life or permenatly damage your fish finder.
Grey Ghost
02-20-2004, 03:37 PM
Just picked up a Lowrance m68 IceMachine last week and it's worked great so far. I had it up on the Saginaw Riv. marking small fish like crazy. Didn't believe what it was tellin' me so I dropped the Aqua-Vu and lo and behold, fish all over the place but almost all in the 8-12" range. It will switch between the traditional graph to a flasher and it does have a split screen zoom for the bottom huggers.
Also took it out to some local panfish spots and was select fishing for specks in an area that is loaded with bluegills. I could tell the difference between the most of the gills and the slab-sided specks on the LCD. I'm really happy with it so far, and it has a fairly detailed GPS built in (real nice for the Bay). I've had it out about 6 times and the battery indicater is still above 3/4, I'm gonna see how long it lasts.
Lots of bells and whistles that I haven't fooled around with yet. Haven't had time, the fish are bitin'.
Northcountry
02-20-2004, 04:30 PM
I have a Lowrance X51 (LCR) portable that I use for icefishing and also attach the transducer to my small boat/canoe with a suction cup during softwater season. I was icefishing with Mark Martin for walleye last winter on Little Bay De Noc, and this was the finder he was using...it was impressive, especially considering the price. When my Humminbird died this summer I bought the X51 as its replacement. I love it!
You want target seperation?
When icefishing, I can easily see my swivel sitting 2' above my jiggin rap in 38' of water. I can also see when my minnow falls off the treble hook. I can split the screen and make the right-half the
entire water column...and the left-half just the bottom 3'. You can very easily watch fish come in low, then rise up to the bait and WHACK! I used it for salmon trolling this past summer in 200' of water no problem. This is a great all-season unit.
Lots of other goodies and easy menus.
Oh, and for you flasher guys, you can change modes and make the screen look and act like a flasher if you want.
-NC
Fishfoote
02-20-2004, 04:53 PM
I don't know about the new LCD, but my experience with the X25a tells me the older units lagged a bit. My vexilar shows the movement on the display in "real time" the LCD had to wait..just a bit.
gamalot
02-20-2004, 05:24 PM
My LCD states the operating temp is -5 to 140*F. I am not too worried about the screen freezing up like the older models used to. I actually have more problems with the batteries not liking the freezing temps then the machine itself.
I have never tried to differentiate my swivel from my bait or seperate two fish side by side in 30 FOW but I see others have and I guess I believe both flashers and LCDs can do it.
The only information I ever really believed from any of the flasher/fishfinders is, #1- is there fish there? #2- What depth are they at? #3- do they move toward my bait/lure or do they appear to be uninterested? I think #3 can be seen with a LCD but with a flasher I would question this translation. I agree there is a bit of lag time on the LCD from when the fish was there to when it is shown on the screen and that it is possible a flasher could be more accurate here but I still don't get the desire to go back in time to flashers when all this neat new stuff is out there.
Don't get me wrong here, I have never even seen a Vex let alone how they work. I have also seen many LCDs and paper graph recorders operated by guys who knew little about the translation of what was being shown.
What I think I am seeing here is the same old story, if you have a VEX then you swear by Vex, if you have a LCD then thats what you go by. I also admit, I don't spend alot of my fishing time watching a screen like I can't get away from the TV for a day!
FishinJoe
02-20-2004, 08:50 PM
Have a Vex and love it for icefishing, would never even think about taking my LCD out.
ih772
02-20-2004, 10:32 PM
I've used both LCD and a flasher for ice fishing. I even used them side by side this winter in an experiment. Both of them show movement in realtime I just find that the flasher is a lot easier to watch movement of fish and your bait. The vex did a better job at separating my lure from the bottom and objects suspended in the water. Another thing about using the vex is I can tell when fish are moving outside the sonar cone by the way the red bottom signal fluctuates as fish move towards the center of it.
Chuck1
02-21-2004, 04:18 AM
why do we even bother? Let them use the lcr/lcd, and we will continue to smoke them on the ice. Obviously some of them have no need to be able to see fish in real time, along with there bait. Stay away from them Vexilars they're no good I tell ya.;)
Lundy43123
02-21-2004, 06:47 AM
gamalot,
You answered your own question, "I've never even seen a Vex let alone how they work"
I've used both on the ice, the flasher wins hands down especially your #3, interperting how the fish is reacting to your bait. Your LCR screen is providing HISTORY on 99% of it's screen, the flasher is providing 100% real time on it's display
The flasher technology is not like going back in time for ice fishing, because it has never gone away. No new technology has been able to replace the instant feedback. The new lowrance unit may have provided an answer for the LCR on the ice, but it's new, I don't know.
Go and find someone using a flasher unit and watch how it works and you won't be asking these questions any longer.
good luck,
Kim
Northcountry
02-21-2004, 08:09 AM
The LCR is a paperless chart recorder. You see this type of equipment in the medical environment and laboratories every day. The previous post was entirely correct, the LCR screen shows 99% "history" and 1% current situation. The flasher has no capability to show you "history", only real time. If you are in a moving boat the recording feature is a huge plus because it shows signal trends which are useful in prediction (drawing the shape of the drop-off for example), but sitting stationary on the ice it is not a "plus"....just a neutral. It doesnt hurt you or slow down the signal processing at all. If you want faster visual updates just crank up the scroll speed.
Dont think the LCR isnt showing you whats happening in "real time" just like the flasher....you just need to know where to look on the screen: the incoming side. I thought this was common knowledge. If you get confused by seeing the "history" on your screen just tape some paper over it so you only see the "new" information. The signals (16-levels of grayscale in my case) will be shown in a vertical column instead of a circular arc like the flasher screen. To me this is more desirable, and since I use the same unit for open water (boat) fishing, the LCR is the right unit for me because I dont want to own two units.
If you think flashers are "superior" to LCR then you have been effected by Vexilars abundant marketing and repetition of these same old lines from fisherman-to-fisherman. Think about it, if the fish signal shows up 1/2-second slower from one fishfinder to the next, whats the big deal? None, but Vexilar will have you think otherwise of course ($cha-ching$). Unless youre trying to snag fish it makes little difference.
tommy-n
02-21-2004, 02:35 PM
For icefishing the flashers are superior, end of disscusion. LCD have their place but not on the ice. What makes the flasher so deadly is the real time, not only because it shows fish, but shows how the fish react to jigging presentations. :D
Northcountry
02-21-2004, 03:33 PM
You havent explained how the flasher is superior at all. A decent LCR will display your swivel, jig, minnow, etc...and it certainly will show the fish reacting to your presentation.
A few weeks ago I was fishing Little Bay De Noc. I left my family in the warm shanty and went prospecting for walleye with my LCR and a bucket to sit on. In about 15 minutes I had three walleye and two perch landed, all on a #7 jiggin rap fished just 6" off the bottom in 22' of water. From about 100-yds away the door on a permanent shanty opened and a guy marched quickly over to me to see what I was doing. It turned out to be a local guide who was using a Vex in his shanty. Said he had alot of "lookers but no takers". He stood behind me to watch my LCR display as I jigged up and down. I pointed out my swivel, my rap, and right on cue....a fish moved in and lined up with the bait. We watched my pole tip and saw a slight *tap* and I set the hook on another nice one and landed it.
He was using a Vex and I was using an LCR. You see, having a flasher does not give you an advantage, regardless of what the advertising may say. Get over it.
By the way, if I want to watch a "flasher" display I can change my screen to that mode. Looks and behaves exactly like any other flasher because they are both displaying the sonar pings immediately.
End of discussion.
gamalot
02-21-2004, 05:33 PM
Heated discussions are, at times, a GOOD THING!
As long as we can all get along:D
I posted this thread because I have both a flasher and an LCR.
Not A VEX, but it works in real time and shows all the info.
I have played with both extensively during slow periods and to be 100% honest, I am able to INTERPRATE the LCR much better then the flasher! Thats not to say you flasher guys can't do as well but I am having better success with the LCR.
I do wish I lived closer and did alot of pearch, crappie and pan fishing because I would gladly take you up on the challenge of Flasher Vs. LCD/LCR and fish on the ice!
As far as History Vs. real time, I can't argue this because it does take a moment for the LCR to print a picture I can see. The point is the picture I CAN see is one I can interprate because it is not a bunch of lines that are here now and then gone. My picture remains till the end of the march accross the screen.
As I stated above, this is all a matter of taste and what you learned on, if you are not willing to give new technology a try then I suspect you will miss what is being offered.
I had a vexilar flasher back in the early 1980s on my boat. Then Lowrance offered paper graphs and then all the big MFGs offered LCD/LCRs and they have all made great advancements in technology.
Some of us get stuck in "WHAT WE KNOW" and others move forward and hope others know a bit more.
For those of you who love your flashers, I say, ENJOY!
For those of us who enjoy learning new ideas and new gadgets I
am with you and who knows what next season will bring.
I can't wait to try them all but I also know there is a learning curve we must get past to operate the new fangled gear.
I refuse to get stuck in the ice or frozen in time and if you look at the electronics of the Vex units you will see they have not changed in years. Packaging aside!
I do expect some hate mail but ask yourself this question, If everyone just gives up and settles on the fact that Vexilar Flashers are at the top of the game and it can't get better, why should any other company even try???
Meanwhile, there are alot of companies out here making advancements in gear because they know there will be a market.
I am in and enjoying it.
Lundy43123
02-22-2004, 01:28 PM
Actually there have been many advancements made in flasher technology in recent years, not in the good old transducer signal but in the software at the recieving end.
The signal from the transducer is basically the same rather you are using a flasher or a LCR. It's what the unit does with the signal that sets them apart.
A LCR will display the same information as a VEX just as well as a vex with a couple of exceptions. The viewable area on a LCR (incoming side) where real time data is displayed is small compared to the viewable area on a flasher. The LCR (majority) have no way of showing you a change in signal strength (fish coming in on your bait) other than to increase the thinkness of the horizontal line (black and white) on the display. The flasher not only increases the line thickness but also changes colors as the signal increases. The LCR does give you the same information, but not in near as user friendly foremat, they weren't designed for that purpose at all.
The new lowrance LCR with the option for a color, flasher type display, with GPS+WAAS will get a try from me next year on the ice. This is the only LCR (that I know of) that a vex has no advantages over. I watched one work on the ice and was very impressed.
I have zero flashers on my boat during the soft water, all LCR's, but Flashers still offer the best current available technology for ice fishing.
Kim
johnny white
02-22-2004, 02:49 PM
northcountry - what unit / setup do you have ?
Northcountry
02-22-2004, 05:12 PM
Kim,
Thanks for the post, sounds like you know your stuff and dont just repeat advertising statements. I'm not sure why you said that LCR's dont show relative changes in signal strength, though. There are a large variety of them out there that have at least 16-levels of greyscale. The darker the plot is the stronger the signal is (according to the manual). I can see this represented perfectly at the bottom, where different levels of stratified deposits display in different densities. But it also shows my minnow as gray (flesh) and my jigging rap as black (solid lead). Schools of small minnows...and the tops of the weed beds often display in shades of gray, too. These are low-density targets. And of course, when I crank the sensitivity up I can see the thermocline, etc.
Sidebar note: I *slammed* the perch today on Lake Skegemog using my LCR and jigging a teardrop in 15' of water (smooth bottom). I couldn't help but think about this topic thread as I watched 3 and 4 perch rise up off the bottom to greet my minnow as it was lowered down. When I clicked the bail and held steady, all targets came to the same level and Bam!, another fish. Three times during the morning I watched schools of bait pass through with aggressive (and nice sized) perch hounding them. Beautiful weather and perfect (for me) electronics. Awesome! When I get done typing this I am going out to clean fish.
Almost forgot, watched one target come up off the bottom and slam my swedish pimple (earlier in the morning) and landed it: a 4-1/2 to 5-lb smallmouth. Turned him right around and sent him back home. Fun fight, though!
-NC
Northcountry
02-22-2004, 05:18 PM
Johnny White, I have a Lowrance X51. This is basically an entry-level LCR. I think it was around $165.00?? Outstanding value, though! I watched Mark Martin (the walleye pro) using it last winter and figured there might be a good reason. He told me he prefers LCR's over the flashers on the ice. When my old Humminbird croaked this past summer I replaced it with the X51.
-NC
tommy-n
02-22-2004, 09:28 PM
hey, north country, your lcr or any other has a huge time lapse by the time it processes and prints. you cannot see how the fish react to the way you jig or move your lure. If you thinks it's so great tell me where and when you want to meet and I would be more than happy to give you an attitude adjustment, tune you right up, show you how the boys play. I fish 3-4 days a week and I spend a lot of time stairring at the flasher, some people just will never see the picture, I'm sure if you ever tried a flasher you would put the LCR back in the boat where it belongs:D
tommy-n
02-22-2004, 09:38 PM
you see I could care less about the advertising, my opinion is based on personal experience, using a vexilar for 15 years 3-4 times a week all winter. I'm a leader not a follower, I make my own news, find my own fish, were not even playing at the same level. I understand for some people it's earier for them to interpet the LCR it shows them a picture , and thats fine, but thers always going to be that time lapse. Every one is entitled to their opion.:)
gamalot
02-22-2004, 11:14 PM
Tommy N, I kind of liked what you said in your first post, " Flashers are superior-END OF DISCUSSION".
I also wish you had left it there.
No one here doubts you are an expert and the mere fact you have used your Vex for 15 years is proof of your mastery of the unit.
Attitude adjustments and tune ups are uncalled for here in this discussion and friendly banter based on facts and personal experience is all we care to hear.
This is not an argument nor should anyone be attacked for voicing their opinion.
Your post and subsequent attack has made me sorry for having started this thread. Based on the tone of your posts I can understand why you have so much time to spend alone watching your Vex.
North country, please accept my appologies for the rudness of others. I do appreciate your informative and knowledgeable discussions regarding the new technology of the more recent offerings of fish finders.
As I stated a few posts back, there are those who are totally unwilling to accept or even give any new stuff the time of day. Again, Flashers are great if thats what YOU like and know. With out a doubt they do exactly what they are designed to do and the Vex does it particulrly well. For those of us who enjoy the updated equipment and technology a flasher simply will not do. I enjoy discussing the new and comparing the tried and true. In the beginning I asked "What does the older flasher technology have over the new LCD/LCR"?
Some of the opinions have been well stated and agreed upon, Ie;
Real time Vs Lag. This being said, I can always use the "real time" flasher function of my LCR. There are also a host of other options available that no Vex has. To some of us, this makes the LCRs more versatile and more desireable.
Please feel free to state your opinions but understand it is not necessary to shove them down our throats.
The Whale
02-23-2004, 03:34 AM
I personally do not agree with this so-called "lag-time" on LCRs. I myself use a low-dollar Piranha 5 Hummingbird rigged for the ice and it represents a real-time, perfect picture of what is going on under the transducer. My 2.5" minnow on a hook in 50' of water is a perfect solid line on my unit ("cartoons" turned off, sensitivity set at 75%, zoom left off) until I jig it. As I lift, my graph shows it, RIGHT NOW. Not a half-second later. In fact, in this kind of depth, I watched both of my baits under me in my shanty as I worked them up / down, outstanding picture clarity of what is happening. I have used this unit for over two-years now and find it is a great thing for me. MHO.:D
Lundy43123
02-23-2004, 06:41 AM
tommy - n,
Wow I thought someone that had used a vex for 15 years would have a litlle better understanding of fish finder technoligy, but I guess not.
They both (LCR and Flasher) display the same information within nanoseconds of each other. The only difference in the DISPLAY, the flaher uses 100% of it's display for current information with no history, the LCR using a TINY part of it's available display for current information and the rest to display history, BUT they both perform exactly the same function, in almost identical time, equally well.
It is a matter of personal prefence and understanding your electronics. A good fisherman that understands electronics is going to be just as effective with a LCR as he is with a flasher.
I prefer a flasher ice fishing, because I believe, for me, the easier to read current data is the most important, I have no real use for the history. Others may prefer some history, so what.
The new Lowrance, LC 67C, offers the best of both worlds, color display, flasher and traditional LCR display, infinate user selectable zooms, plus GPS+WAAS. The vex has zero advantage on this unit EXCEPT the iceducer for the vex.
lighten up, it's just a fishfinder!!!!
Kim
Northcountry
02-23-2004, 07:08 AM
Well Tommy N, there is no noticable time lag when I lift my jig and watch it on the screen. It is immediate. I see no need for anything "faster" than that, if indeed a flasher is faster (I dont care enough to ask the product engineers, but they would be the ultimate authority, I suppose). But if the type of fishing you do calls for 250 mSec faster display then so be it. My fish dont move that fast in winter. In my experience (and I have a few decades) there are alot more important things that effect fishing success.
Now remember, dont take your eyes off of that flasher screen because, oh my, you'll have NO information on exactly where the fish and lure is during that time. Can you imagine fishing without absolute real-time information on the coordinates of the fish relative to the lure? What a waste of time fishing would be! I know, the flasher guys could ask Vex to make a heads-up-display so they can view the flasher on the inside of their snowmobile helmet shield. That way theres no need to take their eyes off of the screen as they talk to their buddy, look at the sunrise, help their kids or any of those other non-productive activities.
I'm just trying to be sarcastic to point out that there is a practical limit to how much technology (and speed) you need. And when LCR's and flashers are both wickedly fast, what is the big deal?
Thanks for the thread Gamalot! Best of luck to you and everyone on the ice! I'm outta here :)
-NC
tommy-n
02-23-2004, 08:51 AM
sorry if I offended anyone, just having a little freindly fun:)
Grey Ghost
02-23-2004, 11:33 AM
You guys have some valid points on the Vexilar. I've had an old Ray Jefferson flasher for years and it helped me catch lots of fish. O.K. lots may be an exageration but at least I could see what was happening down there. The one thing that I didn't like about the flasher was the eye strain after hours of watching flashing lights, my eyes would be plain tuckered out. But, that could be just me.
Last year I sponged off a buddy's Vex and enjoyed useing it but have appreciated an LCD flasher once I picked up the m68c (Lowrance). If you don't like the history of the moving graph, ya just switch to the flasher mode. I personally run the flasher on split zoom most of the time to pick up the 'eyes on the Sag. I don't care for the moving graph although good friend "Chief" Papineau of the PWT swears by it. It's just a matter of personal preference.
But, I don't care for the IceMachine's tranducer mount, it's a pain to worry about it being level. I would rather have the Vexilar's float. I may rig something up.
tommy-n
02-23-2004, 01:39 PM
GreyGhost, the float itself does not really do alot, the flexible transducer cable and the weight of the transducer are the key. I personally removed the float and use the rubber stopper through the hookeye, the hook is slightly open to slide the cable in and out making it very easy to move from hole to hole hardly any set-up time.:)
Pretty easy to rig something up Grey Ghost. Those foam 'swim noodles' for kids and swimming pools work good. I used one to rig up a 'puck' style transducer into a floating transducer.
I used a duck decoy weight and put it on the top of the transducer. Then I used some nylon wire ties to strap the ducer to the end of the cut down 'swim noodle'. The weight always puts the transducer in the correct position and the noodle makes the rig float.
Incidently, I use those swim noodles to store my crawler harnesses, too, those things are handy.
Grey Ghost
02-23-2004, 02:51 PM
Yeah, I was thinking those noodles would work good. Problem is, can't find anything but purple and pink. Wouldn't want the guys to see me with either of those color floats. Just kidding.
Tommy, I know the float doesn't do a lot, but the rig that comes with the Lowrance makes it so ya have to set the unit within a few inches of the hole. This doesn't really work if I want to set it on a pail or anywhere elevated. Also, the little metal bracket is stationary so if there's slush or stuff around the hole, the unit won't sit level and neither will the transducer (ya kind of have to see the way it's set up). It would be much easier with a float or even just dropping the 'ducer in the hole.
Chuck1
02-23-2004, 05:18 PM
Hey tommy n, Your right, and most of us agree, You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink, or in this case think. We ought to have a meet ,and greet on neutral waters, Vex's against LCR's, I know which side my money is on. With the exception of the l68 deal I have not seen an lcr that can compete on the ice. Good luck to you guy's anyway.
Grey Ghost
02-23-2004, 05:23 PM
Chuck1, you hit the nail on the head. I'd agree with ya totally. Flashers are my pick for out on the ice.
Rat-Man
02-23-2004, 05:52 PM
Id like to see the results of a real independent test.
gamalot
02-23-2004, 06:16 PM
Rat-Man, I have to agree on this idea. Independent testing in a controlled environment would be the real proof to put this question to bed.
I would love to see it and what ever the outcome, I am absolutely possitive I would not go back to a flasher nor would flasher guys believe it if the LCRs won.
I still maintain it does not ammount to a hill of beans because we all buy what we are comfortable with and I would never attempt to pry a Vex from it's owners frozen fingers.
Now if only we could get the manufacturers or an independent lab to do some honest testing wouldn't that be great.
Don't hold your breath, ice fishing does not generate this much respect amongst the big boys.
Even if the flashers were proven to be the hands down winner on the ice, lets face it, some of us fish all year round. I get about 3 months of Ice and 9 of soft water. I am certain of what I want on my boat and would not even entertain the discussion.
johnny white
02-23-2004, 06:26 PM
wow this is a hostile thread - let me outta here !
tommy-n
02-23-2004, 08:19 PM
I might have gotten a little excited, but I calmed down now, only after going out yesterday and wacking a limit of gill's, good thearapy.:D
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.