kroppe
04-22-2001, 01:15 AM
Hey all,
Just got my first sonar, Raytheon L365. I love it. I had it out today for about 6 hours in two different bodies of water. One was a medium sized lake and the other was a small pond, backwater of a creek.
First question: do any of you think the sonar is a distraction to fishing, or a beneficial tool? I was using it like a video game and staring at it most of the time. Maybe that will wear off after a while, but I always had the urge to look at the sonar the whole time I was fishing.
Second question: does sonar spook fish in shallow (15 feet deep or less), small bodies of water? I noticed the clicking sound of the sonar in the small pond, but not the larger lake.
Third question: what are the strongest benefits that you get from your sonar, and what tips do you have for using it? I think finding bottom drop-offs and structure is a good benefit. Also water temp is a very good thing to know. Marking fish I think is farther down the list due to false readings.
Fourth question: how many false fish readings do typical sonars give, using fish ID mode? Is it worth it to use fish ID mode, or switch it off?
Thanks for any and all replies.
Just got my first sonar, Raytheon L365. I love it. I had it out today for about 6 hours in two different bodies of water. One was a medium sized lake and the other was a small pond, backwater of a creek.
First question: do any of you think the sonar is a distraction to fishing, or a beneficial tool? I was using it like a video game and staring at it most of the time. Maybe that will wear off after a while, but I always had the urge to look at the sonar the whole time I was fishing.
Second question: does sonar spook fish in shallow (15 feet deep or less), small bodies of water? I noticed the clicking sound of the sonar in the small pond, but not the larger lake.
Third question: what are the strongest benefits that you get from your sonar, and what tips do you have for using it? I think finding bottom drop-offs and structure is a good benefit. Also water temp is a very good thing to know. Marking fish I think is farther down the list due to false readings.
Fourth question: how many false fish readings do typical sonars give, using fish ID mode? Is it worth it to use fish ID mode, or switch it off?
Thanks for any and all replies.