PDA

View Full Version : Lake Charlevoix - Lawsuit filed over docks




Hamilton Reef
04-13-2007, 10:34 AM
Lake Charlevoix - Lawsuit filed over docks

http://www.record-eagle.com/2007/apr/13docks.htm

04/13/07 By CRAIG McCOOL cmccool@record-eagle.com

CHARLEVOIX — A group of homeowners on Lake Charlevoix are suing their neighbors over the right to put docks in the water.

The case, filed recently in Charlevoix Circuit Court, has waterfront and back lot owners battling for control of a neighborhood beach that is separated from the homes by a public road that parallels the shore.

Residents on and off the water in the small Pine Point neighborhood off Boyne City Road historically have shared a limited number of docks, said Ed Engstrom, a back lot owner and one of those being sued.

"For 60 years they've been doing (it) this way. Now somebody doesn't like it. I don't know why,” he said. "I haven't heard of anybody causing problems down there.”

A Record-Eagle employee owns property in the neighborhood but is not party to the lawsuit.

Eight plaintiff waterfront owners are represented by Charlevoix attorney Scott Beatty, who did not return telephone messages this week. Three of the plaintiffs contacted by the Record-Eagle declined to comment.

The group sued a few dozen of their off-the-water neighbors, as well as the Charlevoix County Road Commission, named because the neighborhood and lake are separated by Beach Drive.

The road right-of-way, according to the original community plat map, goes all the way to the shoreline, said road commission manager Patrick Harmon.

Clifford Bloom, a Grand Rapids attorney who represents the Michigan Waterfront Alliance, has handled many riparian — lake and shoreline — rights cases.

"The parallel roads are interesting. Michigan law says if the roadway touches the water … the first tier of lots on the other side of road are deemed to be riparian,” Bloom said. "The courts have held that, generally, people in back cannot put out docks and boats, though they can swim and walk in the lake.”

Bloom added that docks that have been established for 15 years or more sometimes have been allowed to stay.

That's known legally as "adverse possession,” said Engstrom, an attorney who plans to fight the lawsuit. He also said it will be "the biggest claim the back lot owners have.”

"According to law, if you maintain it for 15 years … you get to keep the dock for the rest of your life,” he said. "I think once the judge hears that most of the docks have been there for 15 years or more, he's not going to kick them out.”




Hamilton Reef
04-14-2007, 04:30 AM
Lawsuit challenges rights to use Lake Charlevoix beach:
Pine Point landowners want exclusive rights

http://www.petoskeynews.com/articles/2007/04/10/news/news02.txt

04/10/07 By Fred Gray News-Review Staff Writer fgray@petoskeynews.com

CHARLEVOIX — The Charlevoix County Road Commission has been named party to a suit by 11 front-lot landowners in a 1911 plat on Pine Point who claim they have exclusive rights to the Lake Charlevoix beach in front of their homes by proximity of Beach Drive to the lake.

The road commission says the road was dedicated to public use and therefore everything between it and the lake belongs to the use of the public.

“It will be a battle, but we have to prevail on this,” said road commission manager Pat Harmon. “The front-lot owners want it all to themselves. And there are decisions in favor of the plaintiffs. But public use of the lakefront is in the public interest and has been upheld in a case decided 40 years ago. This could turn into a classic case.”

The landowner-plaintiffs asked the Charlevoix Circuit Court for an injunction against further use of the beach by defendants, who include owners of other property in Pine Point, originally platted by the “North Charlevoix Company” and Charlevoix Township and the public at large.

The suit declares that the Plat of North Charlevoix describes the land platted as extending “along the waters (sic) edge of (Lake Charlevoix).” It says there is no unplatted land lying between the plat and the water.

The suit said all of the plaintiffs are “front lot owners” and own land depicted on the plat separated from the lake solely by Beach Drive.

“Beach Drive abuts each of the plaintiffs’ properties with no other property line between the lake itself and Beach Drive,” it states, and adds: “Each of the plaintiffs own property to which riparian or littoral rights are appurtenant.”

“Riparian” is defined generally as “of, on, or relating to the banks of a natural course of water,” while “littoral” is “of or on a shore, especially a seashore.” In law the terms are the subject of complex and specific definitions and rights.

The suit states that each of the defendants has asserted the right to erect dockage and to moor boats directly in front of plaintiffs’ property and in violation of plaintiffs’ riparian rights. It claims the defendants have trespassed on the plaintiffs’ property, diminished its value, and caused a nuisance.

The suit also states that defendant road commission maintains Beach Drive and may, along with the township, claim an interest in the plaintiffs’ properties.

Harmon produced a decision by Charlevoix Circuit Judge Charles Brown of Dec. 7, 1968, dismissing a request that the court invalidate the petition of some lot owners in the plat to Hayes Township to post Beach Drive as “open to the public.”

In his ruling, Brown stated:

“Streets and alleys in the plat are dedicated to the use of the public — not merely the rights of the abutting property owners — therefore, many others besides plaintiffs would be effected (sic) were this court or any court to find the plat was never accepted or, if so, that the roads streets, street and alleys therein had been abandoned. Certainly such a finding would have the effect of vacating and altering the plat.”

Brown’s decision was upheld on appeal two years later.

swampbuck
04-18-2007, 07:11 AM
If you know any backlotters have them contact the Higgins lake civic assoc. And Rep. Joel Sheltrown. They have the expierience and knowledge these people are going to need.