PDA

View Full Version : To tell or not to tell?




Splitshot
01-15-2007, 05:18 PM
Sorry Whit, but you closed the Rouge post before I had a chance to respond and I felt I had some constructive advice to offer.

Have you ever looked at the bottom of the forums page and looked at how many members are on line and how many guests appear. If you do, you will find that most of the people viewing are guests. Every week, we have thousands of people looking at these boards and I think it is reasonable to assume most of them are outdoors people.

Guys like Bob Qwizdz and Jim Bedford make their living writing about fishing so that is their job. Most of us who post here don’t so why do you want to post about where you have had good success? Frankly I don’t know. I say that even though that is what I used to do. The first time I posted on this site back in 2000 there were around a 1000 members or less. I posted a lot more information than I should have and actually I knew better but I did it anyway. After finding a place like this with such good group of people, I was motivated to be part of the group. It was a mistake. A couple of years ago I realized how much information I had posted on the site and got Steve to delete all my posts to date. Since then he has cancelled that option.

In the end I got burned and found out that some of those nice guys could not be trusted. Now it is years later and I’ve seen it happen over and over again. Posting on this site where you fish will have an impact. It might be only 1 person or maybe 10. When that happens it will have an effect on your fishing now and probably in the future and who is to blame?

Since I am offering my opinion, I will add that I don’t believe that any stream or river or section of river should be off limits to anyone who wants to post about them. Having said that, the best reason not to post about them is because it makes it too easy for people many of whom have no interest in sharing any information with you. They will use your information and pimp it out to just their friends.

None of these streams are as fragile as some people here think. The idea that we are somehow protecting wild fish doesn’t hold water either, but as long as they are the rules it makes no difference. Our streams and rivers have withstood logging and a few fishermen today never going to hurt them much. In fact there are groups of people on almost every river in the state who are working to restore our rivers and it is working. Fishermen can cause harm, but they are being restored at a much faster rate than the little bit of harm caused by fishermen. Besides, if we are going to fish our rivers, we have to expect that we will have some impact.

I also believe that overall fishing is better now than any time in the last 60 years even though fish runs may vary from year to year. It is not Jim Bedford’s fault or Bob Qwizdz or Slim Jim’s fault. The first time I remember seeing Slim Jim on the river, he invited a young kid and his grandfather to fish in his hole and gave them a lot of help without asking anything in return. I’d say $75.00 is a great deal if you want to learn his best holes on the Rouge. At that rate he is not doing it for the money, but because he likes helping people catch fish.

Then again I actually think guides should be eliminated on all rivers smaller than the Grand River or severely limited, but that is another story.

Since this fall I have decided to only post on the cold water forum because even telling people what part of the state I fish in is too much information. In the last 6 plus years I have determined who many trust worthy people are and I share information with those people because I can trust them and they can trust me. There is still a chance I will get burned again, but certainly not as likely as if I posted that I killed the steelhead yesterday on ******** on the SW river forum.

And Bob G., well he called me last summer and told me that he had been hearing about my fishing skills and that he wanted to do a story about me. Very nice guy and everyone I know who knows him says he is a great guy to fish with. A very tempting offer and one I almost took. I have been wrestling with it all the way up to “Rouge” thread and the thread HR posted about Slim Jim. Like some of you, I don’t think HR should be posting those threads but that is just my opinion. As far as fishing with Bob Gwidz, I have decided not to do the article even though. I think posting reports is still a good thing to do.

It is a tough decision to decide that on the one hand you want to share information with other M-S members and the feeling that you are not interested in telling the whole world. My advice is to think hard about posting where you did good. I also suggest that you go to a few outings especially if you are new, or send people a PM and see if they will respond. If you ever send me a PM and don’t have your profile filled out, don’t expect a reply with any credible information. If your new, I usually will give you some basic help just like many others here but the forming of your own network is the best approach in my opinion.




WALLEYE MIKE
01-15-2007, 07:35 PM
Ray, out of the 356 "guests" that are on right now, probably 80% of them are spiders (whatever those are). Yes, we do have alot of lookers but not as many as the stats would indicate. (just to clear this up for you)

ausable_steelhead
01-15-2007, 08:25 PM
Well said Split. I think internet reports have an impact, but less than newspapers and magizine articles. Pressure comes from big numbers of fish. Look at the eastside of the state, we have small runs and therefore way less people. Westsiders have kinda screwed themselves, as anytime someone asks about if they should try a certain river or that they want to go steelheading, everybody says "go west". That has caused ALOT of pressure on the western streams. All the newpapers and mag articles are on the "great steelhead fishing in west Michigan". In the last few years, pressure on westside steelhead streams has risen twofold, BUT you guys are still whacking the fish good. I think that Jeremy L put it best in the original Rogue post, just get out,fish and quit wasting life worrying about how many guys are on the rivers. I think that being careful how you post and how you take your pics will help with keeping things to yourself while at the sametime helping others out. I think the biggest point is the new guys need to put their time in and learn themselves, that's how you get good, TIME ON THE RIVER.

walleyeman2006
01-15-2007, 08:39 PM
yep ive been fishing all over the east side this year and have gotten a few fish .....as far as the steely fishen goes theres basically no one around ....but if the perch and walleye are around those areas are packed as they allways have been..but then thats usually on the big water and too me if i ever get mad over too many people on the saginaw bay lol i need to give up fishing......if i post a location and it gets a few people out fishing and they happen to get fish it will never bother me.....but i totally agree all we can do is give people ideas on how and where because the best fishing report is still a past tense report.....

STEINFISHSKI
01-16-2007, 07:37 AM
Let's please not rehash this tired debate. We all have our opinions, and by the rules of this site are encouraged to share fishing reports within the rules. It will not be tolerated to bash others for choosing to do so. This is rampant in the reports for lakes, rivers, and piers, beaches, and will stop. If you don't like it you will politely be asked to stop or leave.

I really liked Ray's network reference. This is true in all fishing, and by helping out others you can help and meet others you may have never had the chance to. I would be lost in fishing without the friends and contacts I have made through this site. It all started with a single report post and a pm. If you have a network already consider yourself blessed to have such friends. I do every day, so what's the problem with someone else trying to figure it out or set one up. I've been there as the new guy in town, maybe you have too.

What? You guys never got help or met any of your buds on a site? Yeah right!

sfw1960
01-16-2007, 08:08 AM
There is a LOT to be said for the PM box guys....
;)

QuickStrike
01-16-2007, 08:08 AM
I think everyone has been burned at one time or another. And it hurts bad! Especially after you put in the time, and the time, and the time, and some more time to find the fish.

If you read the magazines and analyze the content, fishing tactics and gear stories are the most prevalent. Fishing locations are much harder to come by, and for good reason. The Michigan Sportsman magazine is in my experience the most difficult state magazine to get published in for outdoor writers. It is because they only want pieces from new writers on "where" to fish. In order to publish there you've got to give up your spots, and the locations have to be relatively unheard of. You kill your spots for eternity for a fee of about $200.

Coughing up this information has undesireable affects. But so does applying for the "Master Angler" patch. And so does posting on any website a lake that someone took you to. And frankly, so does talking at the baitshop.

But I think the original post rings true. And it will ring more true as our population numbers and fishing technology increases. It is worth stating over and over and over again. In fact, I think there should be a general warning at the top of each of these pages that describe exactly what can happen to you if you're talking about your (or more likely, someone else's hard won) hotspot.

This is not a worn out topic. It's as pertinent to restate it as some of the other stuff we hold dear on a daily basis (religious issues, copyright laws, etc.) It is worth repeating: It's better to keep quiet concerning your fishing spots.

This must be stated over and over and over, for as long as new people come to this site, and for as long as the ghosts of Marley and Scrooge greedily look on. Protect your spots. For the sole reason that they'll only be yours until someone you don't trust (either today, or ten years from now) finds out. Don't let it be you that let the world in on your secret.

severus
01-16-2007, 08:10 AM
I would be lost in fishing without the friends and contacts I have made through this site. It all started with a single report post and a pm. If you have a network already consider yourself blessed to have such friends.


You just revealed the essence of this website and others, Tim, and hit the nail right square on the head. Beyond the obvious benefit of timely fishing reports and tips, I've gained a lot of good friends via MS.com who share valuable information beneath the turbulence and pettiness of the public forums. I too would be lost without them.

Whit1
01-16-2007, 09:01 AM
Ray,
Quite frankly I am weary of this unending debate that rears its ugly head four or five times a year. Steve and his moderators are reviewing the sites' policy now. There are changes coming and some of them will make members' unhappy and some happy. That's how these things go in here.

This thread will be closed as the reporting on rivers is being discussed with the final decision being in Steve's hands with input from the moderators.