PDA

View Full Version : New World Record Largemouth Bass




BAMBAM
03-20-2006, 10:23 PM
The story at ESPN has photos....what a pig!:D

http://x.go.com/cgi/x.pl?goto=http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/fishing/news/story?page=f_fea_bass_world-record_Weakley_25.1&name=FPT-2377312-032022&srvc=sz
World-record bass boated in California
Largemouth tips scale to 25.1 pounds, then is released back into Dixon Lake
By Brett Pauly
ESPNOutdoors.com senior editor — March 20, 2006


He may have released her, but his intentions were good. Now the question beckons: Will Mac Weakley be rewarded with a world record for this 25.1-pound largemouth bass he boated today in southern California.CARLSBAD, Calif. — "Chaos has broken out."

Well, what do you expect when you notify the media that you boated a potential world-record bass?

That was the story at the home of Mac Weakley, who early Monday caught a largemouth on tiny Dixon Lake in southern California that he and his long-time fishing partner, Jed Dickerson, weighed out at 25.1 pounds on a hand-held digital scale.

If that weight stands up it would shatter what is considered to be the granddaddy of angling records — the 22¼-pound largemouth bass taken in 1932 at Georgia's Montgomery Lake by George Washington Perry.

"I feel good, awesome, in fact," said Weakley, 32, of Carlsbad, Calif, who used a white jig with a skirt and rattle on 15-pound line to boat the brute. "I'm just stoked to see a fish that big."

Claimed by many to be a mark that could never be eclipsed, the largemouth-bass record has become the thing of legends. It's the Joe DiMaggio 56-game hitting streak of the angling world.

"It's simply because there are people who are out there who didn't think a bass can grow to more that 22.25 pounds," said James Hall, editor of Bassmaster magazine. "It's because of how elusive the record has been for so many years."



Fortunately for the naysayers, the fish was documented by two anglers with impressive resumes — Weakley and Dickerson each already are officially recognized for boating top-15 bass of all-time at Dixon Lake — and they claim to have witnesses, photo evidence of the catch and video documentation of today's behemoth on the scale.

"There is no smoke and mirrors," Hall said.

Dickerson believes today's 25.1-pounder is the fish that landed him in the No. 4 spot in The Bassmater Top 25 list when he caught her May 31, 2003, at Dixon Lake — a 70-acre impoundment in San Diego County. He knows this because she has the same distinguishing black dot under her right gill plate. Back then she weighed 21.7 pounds.

"It's the same fish I caught three years ago," said Dickerson, 33, a casino-industry employee from Oceanside, Calif. "I knew this was a world record before we even weighed it. It's the biggest, most ferocious bass in that lake, guaranteed."

But, like any good fishing story, this one comes with several sidebars. There's the fact that the fish was foul-hooked. That is wasn't weighed on a certified scale. And, ultimately, that it was released.

All of which will no doubt conspire to make today's catch much more difficult to be recognized as a world record.

Weakley and Dickerson, who fish Dixon Lake as often as five days a week, said they decided to release the spawning fish because they were under the impression it wouldn't qualify as a record because it was foul-hooked.



Jed Dickerson claims the 21.7-pound he caught in 2003 (above) at California's Dixon Lake is the same 25.1-pounder taken today by his angling parter Mac Weakley.Only later did they discover that may not be the case.

"It may still qualify," Hall said. "The IGFA (International Game Fish Association, the most-recognized keeper of angling records) has a pretty vague rule about foul-hooking, which states you cannot intentionally foul-hook a fish."

Weakley now plans to submit his catch for verification by the IGFA, along with photos, video and the scale.

"We didn't know" about the foul-hooking specifics, he said. "Now we are learning other things about it. If you accidentally foul-hook a fish and you instinctively set the hook, apparently it counts."

We'll certainly learn more about it, also, in the coming weeks as the world-record application is processed.

"It's way too early; this one is really up in the air," Hall said. "Ideally it would have been caught in the mouth and ideally it would not have been released and ideally it would have been weighed on a certified scale.

"Ultimately, however, the fact that he boated a 25-pound largemouth needs to be recognized."

As for the catch itself, Dickerson explained that it was raining and dark this morning when they came across the bedding bass in 12 feet of water. A male — often much smaller than a female in the world of spawning bass — also was on the bed, and it made several stabs at the jig. The anglers couldn't tell whether the male or female was hitting the jig when Weakley set the hook at about 6:40 a.m.

The fish surged to deeper water, then raced toward a nearby dock — where, Weakley said, three people, including the dock attendant for the city-owned facility in Escondido, Calif., witnessed the action. There Dickerson missed netting fish with his initial attempt. By this time it was quite apparent that it was the female at line's end, and one extremely large specimen. It again finned to deeper water, and Dickerson followed in their electric-powered rental boat (all that is permitted for use at the 80-foot-deep reservoir).



More evidence of big bass at Dixon Lake: Mike Long registered the largest largemouth in two decades when he boated this bubba in late April 2001.But five minutes after it was hooked, it was in the net. To the anglers' great dismay, the fish had been hooked in its side. Soon after that sad discovery — and determining that its own weight might hurt the fish in the handling process — the pair decided to release it.

"If I kept pulling it out of the water, I don't know if I would have damaged it. This was so big, we thought we were going to break its neck," Weakley said. "But we were confident in the scale. It is without a doubt the world record, so we let it go."

Hall notes that there is the potential for a lot of cash to be associated with a world-record largemouth bass.

"Had they not released the fish alive — and I think releasing it is the right thing to do — I think they might have made quite a bit of money," Hall said. He surmised that there might be sponsorships from the manufacturers of the gear used to catch the bass and payments for guest appearances with the fish mount on display.

Hall said they still could get a plastic replica mount made, "But I don't know where in the hell they are going to get a mount that large."

Whatever happens, Mac Weakley will no doubt become the poster boy for catch and release and, refreshingly, he's all right with that, even if he doesn't break the record or make a dime.

"Would I be disappointed? Not at all," said Weakley, who is a supervisor at a casino in Oceanside. "I feel I'm very blessed; everything I care about is family and friends. I really don't care about money.

"To tell you the truth, I have a good job and I do all right, and I really don't give a (second thought) about it at all. We're more happy just to see that there is a 25-pound bass still living and in this lake."




ozzgood2001
03-20-2006, 10:27 PM
thats a pig! lets see if it stands up or if the media tears him apart . its great for him but the crap he is gonna go thru.......

redneckman
03-20-2006, 10:31 PM
I sure would like to fish that lake.


Redneckman

BAMBAM
03-20-2006, 10:33 PM
:yikes: http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/outdoors/20060320-1251-bn20bass.html

waterfoul
03-20-2006, 10:36 PM
OK, why in the world would you not, if you already have the fish out of the water for weighing, picture and video taking... measure the damn fish!? ! ? Only takes a few seconds.... length and girth and back in the water.

Southend517
03-21-2006, 08:19 AM
Road Trip!

William H Bonney
03-21-2006, 08:45 AM
thats a pig! lets see if it stands up or if the media tears him apart . its great for him but the crap he is gonna go thru.......
It sounds like he's got the kinda attitude that will get him through this pretty easy. The media can't "run" very far with " I don't care". LOL. He sounds like a cool guy.

DZtaxidermy
03-21-2006, 08:56 AM
I don't see how it could even be considered a record if it was foul hooked.

live2fishdjs
03-21-2006, 09:16 AM
He is either a liar or a prime example of a dumb *****...why would you throw back a fish that has got to be towards the end of (presumably) her life after you took the time to stress it by keeping it, taking pics, video, weigh, etc.

That fish was retirement for he and his entire family for generations to come as long as someone with half a brain for marketing and investing was involved. All the time he is going to spend being stressed out and questioned he could have spent making commercials and having pics taken with the SKIN MOUNT.

My interview at the scales would have been something like this. I caught her on a "A" reel, "B" rod, with "C" line and a "D" leader, rigged with an "E" weight, "F" lure with "G" hooks and an "H" skirt, tied on with an "I" knot that I sprayed with "J" scent, rubbed with "K" scent, and soaked in "L" scent. I used my "M" boat, with "N" trailer...etc etc etc etc pretty sure I could go through the alphabet twice, maybe three times with different manufacturers. I would then do a whorish amount of ads for one month every year and I would be on vacation the other 11 with all of my fishing buddies and family.

Raf
03-21-2006, 09:23 AM
yeah i dont like the fact that it could be considered a record since it was foul hooked. from the story it sounds like it could have been on purpose too. they saw two fish in their spawning bed and one of them was a complete monster. this could cause way too much controversy they should just make it a rule that it has to be hooked legally.

mallardtone-man
03-21-2006, 09:31 AM
He is either a liar or a prime example of a dumb *****...why would you throw back a fish that has got to be towards the end of (presumably) her life after you took the time to stress it by keeping it, taking pics, video, weigh, etc.

That fish was retirement for he and his entire family for generations to come as long as someone with half a brain for marketing and investing was involved. All the time he is going to spend being stressed out and questioned he could have spent making commercials and having pics taken with the SKIN MOUNT.

My interview at the scales would have been something like this. I caught her on a "A" reel, "B" rod, with "C" line and a "D" leader, rigged with an "E" weight, "F" lure with "G" hooks and an "H" skirt, tied on with an "I" knot that I sprayed with "J" scent, rubbed with "K" scent, and soaked in "L" scent. I used my "M" boat, with "N" trailer...etc etc etc etc pretty sure I could go through the alphabet twice, maybe three times with different manufacturers I could do a whorish amount of ads for for one month evry year and I would be on vacation the other 11 with all of my fishing buddies and family.

I agree, that is what I would do, but I will not rip on this guy for the choice he made..

ted stehney
03-21-2006, 09:55 AM
The guy has a pretty good attitude about the whole thing which is great. I don't see how it will be certified. Without going over a certified scale I don't see how it can be recognized. I believe that it beats out Buck Perry so it is good for me! He says he caught the fish a few years back and it weighed 21 pounds, so maybe he can get a three pete. Makes for great coffee time talk. Sorry I can't say more, I'm off to catch the next record walleye!! LOL

9mmruger1
03-21-2006, 10:37 AM
You can be someone else will be targeting her in the near future if she doesn't die from the stress.

...gotta run, plane tickets to buy...jk. :lol:

Natlight
03-21-2006, 10:56 AM
http://espn-att.starwave.com/winnercomm/outdoors/fishing/i/P2_f_Mar20_06_MWeakley.jpg

fishindude
03-21-2006, 11:04 AM
Foul hooked changes the whole thing. I agree with Waterfoul, can't take more than 30 seconds to measure length and girth. But then again with a fish that size who knows. But besides the fact, what a monster! I can't imagine a fish like that.

RichP
03-21-2006, 12:03 PM
Right. A fish brought in an unlawful manner (I'm assuming california game laws prohibit snagging) should not be eligible for the world record. Still, just a chance to get an up-close glimpse at a pig like that would be sweet.

I can only imagine how crowded that lake will be for the foreseeable future...

OTIS
03-21-2006, 01:01 PM
I think it is refreshing that he and his buddy did not see this Fish as their retirement fund.

I think he is a true sportsman for releasing it.

Globalgills
03-21-2006, 01:06 PM
It will take that bass approximately 14 hours to digest that basketball, then it's back to being a nice 8 pounder with hemmoroids..................

dtg
03-21-2006, 01:10 PM
http://espn-att.starwave.com/winnercomm/outdoors/fishing/i/P2_f_Mar20_06_MWeakley.jpg
I think we now know where the casts came from for all those enormous bass mail boxes!!!!

live2fishdjs
03-21-2006, 01:16 PM
Sorry guys my post was my opinion and I stand by it. Anyone that targets bass of that size is a liar if they say they aren't fishing for a world record and the fame, notoriety, and financial benefit that would go along with it.

On the same note-anyone that says they would just release it without it being certified as a world record (which in my oinion a record of that stature would require x-rays/autopsy and the whole bit entailing death to the fish-remember she has got to be at the end of her lifecycle anyway) must like to work a whole lot more than they like to fish.

Keeping one bass for the rest of your life isn't going to hurt the population in the least and I don't think anyone would think of you as less of a "sportsman" for keeping a trophy like that:rolleyes: However, releasing it because it was snagged was admirable and the legal thing to do as it should not/cannot be considered a world record by IGFA rules and most likely should have been released immediately if California law is the same as Michigan with regards to snagged gamefish.

mkroulik
03-21-2006, 04:28 PM
He sounds like a pretty good guy. How many people in this world, would have never admitted that it was snagged, and cashed in big time? The honest thing to do was to release the foul hooked fish, and who can blame him for taking pictures of it. If it was legally hooked, I would agree that the guy was nuts for releasing it. For those of you who don't think it would survive the fight, catch and release, it sounds like he is pretty darn sure it's teh same fish he caught 3 years ago, which means it survived for that long after being caught at 21 lbs.

Mike

fishonbb
03-21-2006, 04:40 PM
Hey globalgill, that bass your holding up looked nice until........:lol:

RichP
03-21-2006, 04:51 PM
The guy who caught, er snagged, that fish in the photo looks like Adam Carolla, though maybe a bit more constipated.

William H Bonney
03-21-2006, 05:09 PM
Sorry guys my post was my opinion and I stand by it. Anyone that targets bass of that size is a liar if they say they aren't fishing for a world record and the fame, notoriety, and financial benefit that would go along with it.,,,
.
Then why didn't he keep it?

Believe me,, I'd a done the same thing as you, on the marketing thing. And I honestly can't say for sure if I'd a "fessed up" that it was foul hooked, although reading throught the article it sounds as if there's some confusion on if the fish was "intentionally" foul hooked. Sounds like the record keepers only care if it was intentionally foul-hooked, now, I assume state law would trump the Record Keepers. That would be a strange one, huh? World Record caught but hooked illegally. Wonder if the record keepers would still recognize it,, if it wasn't foul-hooked intentionally?

MrBluegill
03-21-2006, 07:12 PM
what a pig ive never seen bass that big:yikes:

dabarra3
03-21-2006, 07:33 PM
according to the record books no one has...:chillin:

fishindude
03-21-2006, 07:35 PM
what a pig ive never seen bass that big:yikes:

Neither has anyone else, that's why it's the potential world record!

fishindude
03-21-2006, 07:36 PM
dang it dabarra beat me to it

Off the wall
03-21-2006, 09:15 PM
That makes my 9lber look like a guppie.

Globalgills
03-21-2006, 10:36 PM
Dang, Fishonbb, you made me change my Avatar. I guess I am a little jealous.

live2fishdjs
03-22-2006, 10:29 AM
Then why didn't he keep it?


I would hope and assume the only reason he didn't keep it was California Law as the fish was fould hooked. I can't imagine that the record keepers would make a stipulation for a fish that was "intentionally" or "unintentionally" foul hooked...fishing is getting a fish to bite not setting the hook "around a fish that looks like it bit". My .02.

Due51
03-22-2006, 12:00 PM
The Mitch Rampola of the bass world.
Too bad the guy told the truth :dizzy::confused: about foul hooking.

Good for him, I'll take the story for what it is and believe the guy caught the fish wrong and released it.

mkroulik
03-22-2006, 04:14 PM
according to the latest article on ESPN, he is not even going to persue the world record.

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/fishing/news/story?page=f_fea_bass_world-record_Weakley_25.1_chase-over

Mike

shanny28757
03-22-2006, 06:36 PM
according to the latest article on ESPN, he is not even going to persue the world record.

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/fishing/news/story?page=f_fea_bass_world-record_Weakley_25.1_chase-over

Mike




According to this article he will be applying for the record:

http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/olblog/2006/03/world_record_ba.html

JJ Mac
03-23-2006, 07:12 PM
They have chosen not to submit the fish.

www.signonsandiego.com/sports/outdoors/20060322-9999-1s22bass1.html

If you think Hoyles has an expensive launch fee, I wonder what it will cost on Dixon Lake now?