Should bow season be shortened

[Overdew]

The curtailed thread needs a vote.

[lwingwatcher]

How does that little thing go....there are two wolves and a sheep and they have a vote to decide what to have for lunch...or something like that.

If you wanted better results, you might wanna post a poll somewhere other than in the archery tech forum....:lol: :lol: :lol:

[Overdew]

say what
Let the people vote, look how well it works for the USA

[kbotta]

I voted for the least. If there was 0 Iwould have voted for that....
kb nuff said........

[sniper's mojo]

This message is not intended to the starter of this thread.

Invest a fair amount of money in lessons and equipment and enjoy a different side of hunting that you have been missing. Then go back and keep on gun hunting. There is to much time wasted on gun hunter versus bow hunter. When the reality is 90 percent of bow hunters gun hunt also. Enjoy the outdoors is the message.

[Overdew]

How does that little thing go....there are two wolves and a sheep and they have a vote to decide what to have for lunch...or something like that.

If you wanted better results, you might wanna post a poll somewhere other than in the archery tech forum....:lol: :lol: :lol:

I smell fear :whistle:

[stelmon]

How about a "leave it the way it is?"

[Overdew]

rats did not leave that option, but I am with you brother

[kbotta]

You know what overdrew, I don't mind objective arguing. It helps folks to see things that might have missed.

[Backwoods-Savage]

No harm meant and this is not a personal attack on anyone, but:

It matters not if you are for or against bow season and the length of it, the poll is slanted and therefore absolutely no good.

If you are going to have a poll and have it correct, you must look at all sides. Because you are assuming that the season should be shortened, that leaves out lots of voters. Maybe you should have even included an amount that it should be lengthened to?!

[lwingwatcher]

It matters not if you are for or against bow season and the length of it, the poll is slanted and therefore absolutely no good.



Excellent point...and good reason not to mislead anybody by voting on this one.

[Whit1]

You'll notice that a couple of posts above have been edited. One has been deleted. Polls are just that......polls and nothing more. Keep the discussion civil and out of the realm of K-12 school.

Keep in mind the last thing those who hunt and fish would like to do is to put things to a vote. Be careful what you wish for.

[Erik]

You didn't give an option to say "no it shouldn't be shortend" so I can't vote.
Anyway in answer to your question. NO it shouldn't be shortend! In fact it should be extended! And if anything firearm season should be shortend!!!!!!

[GVDocHoliday]

You didn't give an option to say "no it shouldn't be shortend" so I can't vote.
Anyway in answer to your question. NO it shouldn't be shortend! In fact it should be extended! And if anything firearm season should be shortend!!!!!!

I can't vote for the same reason. I also echo this post full heartedly.

[Pinefarm]

I also couldn't vote because there was no option for "no".

[Ranger Ray]

No.

[Liv4Huntin']

Pretty much useless poll..... one-sided. Waste of time. (but then that's just my opinion.)
Can't vote because of it.:rolleyes:

~ m ~

[Bobcat]

zero Days !!!

[farmlegend]

It matters not if you are for or against bow season and the length of it, the poll is slanted and therefore absolutely no good.

Absolutely correct, BWS. As to the construction of this poll, it may as well have been designed by the New York Times.:lol:

[weatherby]

How about a "leave it the way it is?"


That would work great if people would just fill THEIR 2 tags and call it good. Just my 2 cents on the problem where i hunt. The people by me who work and have access to mich-con property go by the theory of anyone's buck tag is my tag to use as long as it's a legal buck is gettin old

[Whit1]

I've closed this poll. In order to get even a hint of what members think about issues an effective poll offers all sides and this one certainly doesn't.